Typically, if you are a beneficiary of a revocable living trust or an heir of a trustor or grantor (the person that created the [...]
Typically, if you are a beneficiary of a revocable living trust or an heir of a trustor or grantor (the person that created the […]
Executive Summary Introduction A trust is a legal arrangement where one person or entity, known as the “trustee,” holds the title to property and [...]
Executive Summary Introduction A trust is a legal arrangement where one person or entity, known as the “trustee,” holds the title to property and […]
Key Takeaways Introduction Trust contests and related disputes can derail the trust administration process, delaying distributions to beneficiaries and potentially putting the fulfillment of [...]
Key Takeaways Introduction Trust contests and related disputes can derail the trust administration process, delaying distributions to beneficiaries and potentially putting the fulfillment of […]
Elit est habitant sit ullamcorper et sed id ipsum est eget nulla nisl consequat nec pretium id sed urna at dui a neque donec purus vitae purus nunc metus nibh donec volutpat eu a iaculis commodo mus quisque nullam aenean nulla id malesuada et nam lectus ullamcorper morbi euismod semper consectetur massa turpis proin natoque ornare leo massa neque urna tellus urna turpis habitant mi lectus vulputate non commodo sit in pulvinar ut velit fringilla molestie vitae sed ultricies quis ut nibh volutpat id dolor fermentum donec facilisis quis nulla ac diam pretium nec urna nunc scelerisque facilisi nulla facilisis nec at malesuada morbi non risus semper enim pharetra nunc eu diam habitant at vestibulum non morbi maecenas sed in scelerisque sagittis a in pellentesque at suspendisse leo semper odio morbi amet porta feugiat pretium tempor platea nibh blandit diam imperdiet lacus ipsum ut sed dui massa enim curabitur urna.
Consectetur nisl sed et dignissim in lobortis nibh posuere lorem pulvinar gravida justo et nibh fames eros sed congue hendrerit diam ac convallis eu faucibus risus id risus nibh fringilla platea sem eu varius orci scelerisque turpis aenean arcu fames lectus adipiscing venenatis est velit purus ullamcorper urna morbi ullamcorper sit pulvinar ornare condimentum a habitant varius ipsum euismod pellentesque ullamcorper tortor non viverra donec velit morbi volutpat pretium ipsum at condimentum id tristique et non nisi morbi posuere elementum fermentum luctus varius quam et lectus ipsum tristique a varius diam enim aliquet eget quisque congue semper purus tempor tempor justo ornare tempus ornare quam hac sem enim orci urna enim odio fermentum lacus arcu odio tellus viverra faucibus sed urna molestie leo in erat massa sollicitudin et ultrices molestie velit suspendisse ultrices proin mattis egestas nisl fusce faucibus cras sit vehicula bibendum eget malesuada diam metus mauris at diam ornare enim volutpat id sit molestie arcu pellentesque morbi integer sed sollicitudin eu ipsum lobortis dictumst eu posuere at sed id pulvinar enim turpis viverra sapien mollis pulvinar pellentesque nec id egestas et nisl suscipit nunc aliquet et enim suspendisse auctor lectus fermentum montes id nunc felis ut ornare tellus justo fringilla ornare ut ut in mi etiam praesent in.
A trust contest is a legal proceeding that challenges the validity of a trust or a specific amendment, typically on grounds such as undue influence, lack of capacity, fraud, duress, mistake, or improper execution. The goal is to set aside all or part of the instrument that is alleged to be invalid so that assets pass under a prior trust, a will, or by intestacy if no valid document controls. Because outcomes directly affect who inherits and in what amounts, these cases can be complex and emotional. Many disputes settle through negotiation or mediation; when enforceable relief is needed, a probate court decides the issues and enters binding orders.
Answers to common questions about trust contests, helping you better understand your rights and the legal processes involved in protecting your interests.
In general, a trust contest can be filed by those with a direct stake in the outcome. In California, trustees and beneficiaries may petition regarding a trust’s internal affairs, and a person cut out by a later amendment can challenge that amendment’s validity because, if it is set aside, they revert to beneficiary status. In Texas, “interested persons” may bring a trust action, which includes trustees, beneficiaries, and others who have an interest in or claim against the trust or are affected by its administration; courts decide standing case by case, and contingent beneficiaries may qualify. In both states, eligibility to file interacts with strict deadlines that often run from the date of notice, so it is important to confirm standing and timing before proceeding
rusts are most often challenged on recognized legal bases that attack validity or the circumstances of execution. The principal grounds are:
Undue influence: someone exerted pressure or control over the grantor so the trust or amendment reflects the influencer’s wishes rather than the grantor’s. Indicators include isolation, sudden changes favoring a caregiver or new confidant, secrecy, and dependence.
Lack of capacity: at the time of signing, the grantor did not understand the nature of the act, the property, or the natural objects of their bounty. Capacity is time specific and may require medical records and witness testimony.
Fraud or duress: the document was procured by deception or by threats/force that overcame the grantor’s free will.
Improper execution: the instrument does not meet statutory formalities, such as required signatures, notarization, or witness requirements for that type of trust or amendment.
Mistake and reformation: a clerical error or drafting mistake prevents the document from reflecting the grantor’s true intent. Some jurisdictions allow courts to reform the text upon clear and convincing evidence.
Forgery or alteration: signatures or pages were forged, substituted, or added after execution.
Revocation or superseding instrument: a later valid trust or amendment revoked the earlier one.
Illegality or public policy: provisions that are unlawful or unenforceable.
Evidence that commonly supports these grounds includes the drafting file, prior versions of the plan, medical and caregiving records, financial statements, emails and texts, witness declarations, and expert opinions on capacity or influence. Note that petitions to interpret ambiguous language or to correct a scrivener’s error are usually not “trust contests” unless they also allege invalidity. If you share your state, I can tailor this to local standards of proof and execution requirements.
Trust contests are subject to strict deadlines, which vary by state and by when you received notice of the trust. Missing these deadlines could permanently bar your claim, making early legal advice critical. Bottom line: call a lawyer immediately to calculate your exact deadline from your notice date and facts.
If the court finds a trust or amendment invalid, it can be set aside in whole or in part. Assets then pass under a prior version of the trust, under a will, or by intestacy if no valid document controls. The court can also issue instructions that clarify administration, reform mistaken language where the law allows, and order distributions consistent with the grantor’s true intent.
A successful contest often triggers additional relief. The court may require a full accounting, remove or suspend the trustee, appoint a successor, and surcharge a fiduciary to recover losses caused by misconduct. It can impose a constructive trust or turnover orders to recapture assets wrongly transferred. Fee shifting is sometimes available by statute or court order, which can affect who pays attorneys’ fees and costs.
Timelines vary with the complexity of the issues, the number of parties, the volume of documents, expert involvement, and the court’s calendar. Narrow disputes can resolve in several months, particularly if settlement occurs early. Contested matters that involve capacity or undue influence evidence, multiple depositions, expert witnesses, or asset tracing commonly take twelve to twenty-four months or longer, and an appeal can add additional time.
Yes. Many trust disputes resolve without a trial and often without filing a petition. Common paths include direct negotiation, mediation, and nonjudicial settlement agreements that document accounting fixes, distribution terms, trustee obligations, fee adjustments, or tax and administrative provisions. Some trusts include arbitration clauses; where enforceable, a private arbitrator can decide the dispute. These options are usually faster, less costly, more private, and allow creative solutions that a court might not order.
For enforceability, settlements should be put in a signed agreement and, when appropriate, submitted to the probate court for approval or a consent order. Court confirmation is especially important if the deal affects minors, charitable interests, or modifies core trust terms. Even while pursuing settlement, good practice is to prepare the case: exchange key documents, clarify issues, consider a standstill or tolling agreement to preserve deadlines, and mediate after pivotal disclosures or depositions.
If cooperation breaks down or assets are at risk, you may still need the court for subpoenas, injunctive relief to freeze assets, orders compelling an accounting or distributions, trustee suspension or removal, or surcharge. Many cases still settle after filing, once the parties see the evidence and the court sets timelines.
Because results, rights, and timelines are on the line. A trust dispute is not just paperwork. it is a fight over money, control, and legacy with strict deadlines and rules of evidence. A trust litigation attorney brings immediate leverage by identifying your strongest claims and defenses, preserving your deadlines, and positioning the case for the fastest path to meaningful relief and resolution.
An experienced lawyer knows how to force action and protect assets. They can compel a trust accounting, obtain court orders to freeze or recover property, remove or suspend a breaching trustee, seek surcharge to make the trust whole, and secure distributions you are entitled to. If you are a trustee, they defend you against unfounded claims, streamline administration, and obtain instructions that reduce risk and cost.
Strategy matters. Your attorney gathers and analyzes the records that move judges, develops medical and financial evidence on capacity or undue influence, works with experts, and uses negotiation or mediation to settle on favorable terms when that serves you. If settlement fails, they are ready for trial and know the local probate court’s procedures, calendars, and expectations.
Bottom line: hire a trust litigation attorney to turn concern into action, evidence into remedies, and delay into decisions. It is the difference between hoping for fairness and obtaining it.
A member of the RMO Client Relations team will reach out to gather additional information concerning the parties to your case and schedule your consultation.
Please note that communications by you to RMO LLP or any of its lawyers through this website do not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the firm. Do not send any privileged or confidential information to the firm through this website or otherwise until instructed in writing from us to do so.
